國家圖書館 期刊文獻資訊網

連結國家圖書館 連結期刊文獻資訊網

臺灣期刊論文索引

參考文獻列表


參考書目

方孝謙(1999)。〈什麼是再現?跨學門觀點初探〉,《新聞學研究》,60: 115-148。

王音力(2000)。《鄂蘭》。台北:生智。

江宜樺(2001)。《自由民主的理路》。台北:聯經。

江宜樺(2000)。〈政治判斷如何可能?簡述漢娜‧鄂蘭晚年作品的關懷〉,《當代》,150: 28-43。

林芳玫(1996)。《女性與媒體再現﹕女性主義與社會建構論的觀點》。台北﹕巨流。

張玉佩(2005)。〈從媒介影像觀照自己:觀展∕表演典範之初探〉,《新聞學研究》,82: 43-87。

張玉佩(2004)。〈閱聽人概念之探索:從網路經驗出發〉,《中華傳播學刊》,5: 37-71。

張玉佩(2003)。《當代閱聽人研究之理論重構:試論閱聽人的思辨能力》。政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。

黃光玉(2002年6月)。〈再探「主動的閱聽人」之核心意涵:質化與量化的異同〉,「2002中華傳播學會研討會」,台北縣深坑。

黃麗玲譯(1992)。〈意識形態的再發現-媒體研究中被壓抑者的重返〉,陳光興(編),《文化,社會與媒體》,頁87-136。台北:遠流。

蔡英文(2002)。《政治實踐與公共空間:漢娜.鄂蘭的政治思想》。台北:聯經。

蔡英文(2000)。〈革命、人民主權與制憲:漢娜‧鄂蘭對「革命民主」傳統的闡述〉,《當代》,150: 44-59。

Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.

Alasuutari, P. (1999). Introduction: three phases of reception studies. In P. Alasuutari. (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience: The new agenda (pp. 1-21). London: Sage.

Arendt, H. (1982a). Postscriptum to thinking. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Hannah Arendt: Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy (pp. 3-5). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H. (1982b). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Delivered at the New School For Social Research. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Hannah Arendt: Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy (pp. 7-77). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H. (1982c). Imagination. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Hannah Arendt: Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy (pp. 79-85). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H. (1978). Thinking. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Arendt, H. (1977). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin Books.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. New York: The Noonday Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chang, Y. (2005, May). Inquiry into the critical thinking of audiences: A new approach based on Hannah Arendt. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.

Disch, L. J. (1996). Hannah Arendt and the limits of philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press.

Foss, S. K. (1989). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration & practice. Prospect Heights, ILL: Waveland.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

Gibson, T. A. (2000). Beyond cultural populism: Notes toward the critical ethnography of media audiences. Journal of Communication inquiry, 24(3), 253-273.

Gray, A. (1999). Audience and reception research in retrospect: The trouble with audiences. In P. Alasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience: The new agenda (pp. 22-37). London: Sage.

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128-139). London: Hutchinson.

Hart, R. P. (1990). Modern rhetorical criticism. Austin, TX: HarperCollins.

Hoijer, B. (1999). To be an audience. In P. Alasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience: The new agenda (pp. 179-194). London: Sage.

Livingstone, S. M. (1990). Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. London: Pergamon.

Morley, D. (1999). ‘To boldly go…’: The ‘third generation’ of reception studies. In P. Alasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience: The new agenda (pp. 195-205). London: Sage.

Murphy, P. D. (1999). Media cultural studies’ uncomfortable embrace of ethnography. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23(3), 205-221.

Radway, J. (1987). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy and popular literature. London: Verso.

Roscoe, J., Marshall, H., & Gleeson, K. (1995). The television audience: A reconsideration of the taken-for-granted terms ‘active’ ‘social’ and ‘critical’. European Journal of Communication, 10(1), 87-108.

Ruddock, A. (2001). Understanding audiences: Theory and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yar, M. (2000). From actor to spectator: Hannah Arendt’s ‘two theories’ of political judgment. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(2), 1-27.