國家圖書館 期刊文獻資訊網

連結國家圖書館 連結期刊文獻資訊網

臺灣期刊論文索引

摘要

本篇出處 臺灣詩學學刊 32 2018.11[民107.11] 頁87-133
篇名 陳芳明《臺灣新文學史》的「現代詩」批評
作者 丁威仁
中文摘要   文學史的寫作、表述與經典的選取,會因為不同史家的書寫環境、個人觀點、意識形態等,而產生歧異。本文欲探討,在以小說為主要綜論文類主軸的《台灣新文學史》中,作為文類邊緣的新詩(現代詩),是如何在史家思維中被放置與安頓?換言之,本文欲討論陳芳明的《台灣新文學史》是在怎樣的批評觀點上,進行詩人的選擇、詩史的脈絡與詩美學觀點的書寫,同時分析陳芳明對於現代詩的詩學判準,理解其詩學思維,進而呈現《台灣新文學史》中現代詩批評的本質、方法與思考模式。本文認為,在陳芳明之新詩(現代詩)史述的視野中,對於新詩文本的認識,的確站在一個抒情性與現代性優位的角度,而進行文本的選擇與分析。而在此觀點之下,卻產生了斷裂與偏斜的現代詩史觀:無論是在笠詩人與創世紀詩人的討論比重、寫實主義詩人與現代主義詩人的分析偏向、還是對一九七○年代出生詩人的漠視、對一九八○年代後出生詩人的陌生,都出現了闕漏或偏誤。本文希望透過精細的論述與辨析,進行對陳芳明詩學觀的探討,並提出對於《台灣新文學史》在現代詩批評部分的研究看法
英文摘要   The writing environment, personal views and ideology among various historians will make differences of writing, expression and texts choices of literary history. Since the main review genre of "The History of Taiwan's New Literature" is novels, this article wants to explore how the new poetry (modern poetry), as a minor genre, is placed and settled in the historian's mind. In other words, this article discusses how Chen Fangming's critical opinions in his "The History of Taiwan's New Literature" affect his choices of poets, the writing of poetry history and the poetic aesthetics. Further, this paper analyzes Chen Fangming's poetic judgment on modern poetry, understands his thoughts about poetic s, and then presents the essence, methods and thinking modes of modern poetry criticism in The History of Taiwan's New Literature. This paper believes that in the perspective of Chen Fangming's new poetry (modern poetry), his preference of lyrical poetry and modernism does influence his selection and analysis of the poetry texts in his book. From this point of view, there are breaks and skews in his history of modern poetic: whether it is the proportion of discussion between poets, the analytical bias of realist poets and modernist poets, or the ignorance of 1970s born poets and the strangeness of the poet born after the 1980s have all been flawed or biased. This thesis hopes to explore Chen Fangming's poetics through fine exposition and analysis, and puts forward the views on Chen's criticism of modern poetry in "The History of Taiwan's New Literature